Monday 18 October 2010

new lens recipe..opinions?

documentation of live performance?

limbs, sound, sweat, eye contact, interaction and, perhaps above all:

inner motive

how do you preserve all this in film?

what's the point of "canning" a fresh show?

the aging valid reasons of "reference" and "portfolio" seem no longer enough to film performance..

i am full on different approaches to the concept. multiple takes, non-linearity, flexing of rhythm and physical gesture..

capturing performance on video not as re-enactment but as re-action to the action..

in a different form,yes, but one that just like live action, it is validated through its uniqueness..

traditional, "archiving" footage will still go on along this attempt..

V


3 comments:

  1. Oh yes please. This is how I should like people to video my pieces (ie, as their pieces). Kurt Kren did it very nicely for Otto Muehl and Gunter Brus. I'm sure there are a million nice ways of doing it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i think we need to talk about this more. in general i find documentation of performance (through photography and video) a frustrating distraction. Performance is about time and space and now.
    although i'm interested by the idea of using documentation to make new work i think this needs to be done in conversation with all involved.
    thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  3. yep, i want this ephemera to be more than document of what was - hmmm

    ReplyDelete